Connect with us

Inside America

BREAKING News: President Trump signs an order aimed at curbing protections for social media giants!

Published

on

President Trump signs an order aimed at curbing protections for social media giants

, Alleging bias against conservatives he said, “We’re fed up with it.” Legal experts have expressed doubts Trump can do much by himself, without an act of Congress.

How it all began.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is escalating his war on social media companies, preparing to sign an executive order Thursday challenging the liability protections that have served as a bedrock for unfettered speech on the internet.

Still, the move appears to be more about politics than substance, as the president aims to rally supporters after he lashed out at Twitter for applying fact checks to two of his tweets.

The proposed order would direct executive branch agencies including the Federal Communications Commission and the Federal Trade Commission to study whether they can place new rules on the companies — though experts express doubts much can be done without an act of Congress.

Trump and his allies, who rely heavily on Twitter to verbally flog their foes, have long accused the tech giants in liberal-leaning Silicon Valley of targeting conservatives on social media by fact-checking them or removing their posts. The executive order was expected to argue that such actions should cost those companies their protection from lawsuits for what is posted on their platforms.

Companies like Twitter and Facebook are granted liability protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act because they are treated as “platforms,” rather than “publishers,” which can face lawsuits over content.

A similar executive order was previously considered by the administration but shelved over concerns it couldn’t pass legal muster and that it violated conservative principles on deregulation and free speech.

Two administration officials outlined the draft order on the condition of anonymity because it was still being finalized Thursday morning. But a draft was circulating on Twitter — where else?

“This will be a Big Day for Social Media and FAIRNESS!” Trump tweeted.

Press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the Twitter fact checks reflected “bias in action” and Trump aimed to sign the order by the end of the day.

Trump and his campaign reacted after Twitter added a warning phrase to two Trump tweets that called mail-in ballots “fraudulent” and predicted “mail boxes will be robbed.” Under the tweets, there’s now a link reading “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” that guides users to a page with fact checks and news stories about Trump’s unsubstantiated claims.

Trump accused Twitter of interfering in the 2020 presidential election” and declared “as president, I will not allow this to happen.” His campaign manager, Brad Parscale, said Twitter’s “clear political bias” had led the campaign to pull “all our advertising from Twitter months ago.” In fact, Twitter has banned political advertising since last November.

Late Wednesday, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey tweeted, “We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally.”

Dorsey added: “This does not make us an ‘arbiter of truth.’ Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves.”

On the other hand, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Fox News his platform has “a different policy, I think, than Twitter on this.”

“I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” he said.

The president’s critics, meanwhile, scolded the platforms for allowing him to put forth false or misleading information that could confuse voters.

“Donald Trump’s order is plainly illegal,” said Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat and advocate for internet freedoms. He is “desperately trying to steal for himself the power of the courts and Congress. … All for the ability to spread unfiltered lies.”

Trump’s proposal has multiple, serious legal problems and is unlikely to survive a challenge, according to Matt Schruers, president of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a Washington-based organization that represents computer and internet companies.

It would also seem to be an assault on the same online freedom that enabled social media platforms to flourish in the first place — and made them such an effective microphone for Trump and other politicians.

“The irony that is lost here is that if these protections were to go away social media services would be far more aggressive in moderating content and terminating accounts,” Schruers said. “Our vibrant public sphere of discussion would devolve into nothing more than preapproved soundbites.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said it was “outrageous” that while Twitter had put a fact-check tag on Trump’s tweets asserting massive mail-in election fraud, it had not removed his tweets suggesting without evidence that a TV news host had murdered an aide years ago.

“Their business model is to make money at the expense of the truth and the facts that they know,” she said of social media giants, also mentioning Facebook. She said their goal is to avoid taxes “and they don’t want to be regulated, so they pander to the White House.”

The order was also expected to try to hold back federal advertising dollars from Twitter and other social media companies that “violate free speech principles.”

The president and fellow conservatives have been claiming, for years, that Silicon Valley tech companies are biased against them. But there is no evidence for this — and while the executives and many employees of Twitter, Facebook and Google may lean liberal, the companies have stressed they have no business interest in favoring on political party over the other.

The trouble began in 2016, two years after Facebook launched a section called “trending,” using human editors to curate popular news stories. Facebook was accused of bias against conservatives based on the words of an anonymous former contractor who said the company downplayed conservative issues in that feature and promoted liberal causes.

Zuckerberg met with prominent right-wing leaders at the time in an attempt at damage control, and in 2018, Facebook shut down the “trending” section,.

In August 2018, Trump accused Google of biased searches and warned the company to “be careful.” Google pushed back sharply, saying Trump’s claim simply wasn’t so: “We never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment.”

Experts, meanwhile, suggested that Trump’s comments showed a misunderstanding of how search engines work.

Last year, Trump again blasted social media companies after Facebook banned a slew of extremist figures including conspiracy peddler Alex Jones from its site and from Instagram.

Meanwhile, the companies are gearing up to combat misinformation around the November elections. Twitter and Facebook have begun rolling out dozens of new rules to avoid a repeat of the false postings about the candidates and the voting process that marred the 2016 election.

The coronavirus pandemic has further escalated the platforms’ response, leading them to take actions against politicians — a move they’ve long resisted — who make misleading claims about the virus.

Last month, Twitter began a “Get the Facts” label to direct social media users to news articles from trusted outlets next to tweets containing misleading or disputed information about the virus. Company leaders said the new labels could be applied to anyone on Twitter and they were considering using them on other topics.

The Democratic National Committee said Trump’s vote-by-mail tweets should have been removed, not just flagged, for violating the company’s rules on posting false voting information.

“After taking too long to act, Twitter once again came up short out of fear of upsetting Trump,” the party said in a statement.

___

AP writers Amanda Seitz, Barbara Ortutay and David Klepper contributed.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inside America

Sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson, arrested for domestic violence

Published

on

September, Sha’Carri Richardson

Sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson, the reigning 100-meter world champion, finds herself at the center of a troubling incident that could overshadow her fiercely promising career. Last weekend, Richardson was arrested at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on a fourth-degree domestic violence charge, following an alleged altercation with her boyfriend, fellow sprinter Christian Coleman. This news arrives mere days after Richardson showcased her blazing speed in the opening round of the women’s 100 meters at the U.S. track and field championships in Eugene, Oregon—a reminder that her athletic prowess remains undeniable even as controversy brews.

According to a police report obtained NewYorkGM, an officer was alerted by a TSA supervisor to a disturbance between Richardson and Coleman. Surveillance footage captured Richardson grabbing Coleman’s backpack and forcibly yanking it away, subsequently blocking his path and shoving him against a wall. The report also detailed how Richardson seemingly threw an item, possibly a pair of headphones, at Coleman. Despite this, Coleman reportedly declined further involvement in the investigation, refusing to participate as a victim.

Richardson was taken into custody at the South Correctional Entity in Des Moines, Washington, late Sunday evening and released the following afternoon. USA Track and Field, while aware of the situation, has yet to offer a comment. Meanwhile, efforts to reach Richardson’s representatives for insight have so far gone unanswered.

For a star athlete whose life has been marked by breathtaking highs—a world championship win in Budapest, an Olympic gold medal in the 4×100 relay, and a silver medal at the Paris Games—this incident evokes a complex question about accountability and the pressures athletes face behind the scenes. Richardson’s meteoric rise has already been tested; a positive marijuana test at the 2021 U.S. Olympic trials cost her a coveted spot at the Tokyo Olympics and left many questioning her path forward.

Now, as she prepares to defend her title at the world championships in Tokyo this September, Sha’Carri Richardson confronts a crossroads. Will she emerge from this personal turmoil with renewed focus and resilience, or will the shadows of this episode cast a lasting pall over her legacy? The world watches closely—not just as fans of her speed and strength, but as observers of the human story behind the medals. In a sport that demands peak physical performance and mental clarity, Richardson’s next steps will speak volumes about her character and future beyond the track.

Continue Reading

Inside America

ICE Arrest of South Korean Student & Peruvian Asylum seeker.

Published

on

Ice

Outrage is swelling as ICE arrests a South Korean college student and a Peruvian asylum seeker mere moments after their routine court hearings earlier this week. Supporters and advocates alike decry these abrupt detentions as not just unjust, but as a calculated assault on some of the most vulnerable among us—immigrants striving to navigate the legal system with honesty and hope. This troubling pattern of fear and intimidation strikes at the core of our values, undermining the very foundations of justice and due process. Our community demands an immediate halt to these harsh and inhumane tactics. We call for a compassionate approach—one that honors the dignity, rights, and humanity of all those seeking safety and the promise of a better life on our shores. It is time to stand united against injustice and uphold the true spirit of fairness and empathy in our immigration system.

Sad.

Continue Reading

Inside America

New York City: The Aftermath of Donald Trump’s Victory-allah-bama reacts

the city that never sleeps was indeed asleep. It was a somber sight. Where are all the millions of people who typically fill the streets? From 42nd Street, the world’s most famous thoroughfare, to the Empire State Building and the World Trade Center, an eerie quietness enveloped everything. Millions of New Yorkers are still reeling in shock

Published

on

Aguike, pictures

Rumor has it that the streets of the greatest city in the world are deserted following Donald Trump’s victory over Kamala Harris. I took my R5C for a drive and discovered that, for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic, the city that never sleeps was indeed asleep. It was a somber sight. Where are all the millions of people who typically fill the streets? From 42nd Street, the world’s most famous thoroughfare, to the Empire State Building and the World Trade Center, an eerie quietness enveloped everything. Millions of New Yorkers are still reeling in shock. Many individuals are grappling with depression, and I know some who have already started therapy.

I’ve given simple advice to friends, fans, close buddies, and even family members who are struggling with this stress and are imagining what another four years of a Trump presidency might feel like: stay away from the news. Turn off the cable networks. Take a deep breath, have a little nap, and wake up as if nothing has happened. Forget about politicians and politics, and you’ll find yourself returning to normalcy. Engage in activities that bring you joy; politics is dirty, and the world will be a better place without it.

AGUIKE (also known as Emma Agu)
President, US Global Media, LLC
Bayside, New York

Aguike, pictures
Aguike, pictures

Continue Reading

Art

R Kelly, Sean ‘P-Diddy’ Combs & the power of money, AGUIKE writes

Published

on

Jammie Fox-R-Kelly-Sean Combs

R. Kelly, a highly talented musician, is currently serving a lengthy prison sentence after being convicted of sexual misconduct with multiple women. Most notably, some of these women were his girlfriends, including the mother of his children. Just last night, it was reported that Jamie Foxx, the musician, comedian, and Oscar winner, is facing accusations of sexual misconduct from an individual identified as Jane Doe.

Recently, Sean Combs (also known as P Diddy or Puff Daddy) was accused by his ex-girlfriend and R&B singer Cassie of rape and coercing her into engaging in sexual activities with prostitutes while also using drugs. However, before the situation could escalate further legally, a monetary settlement was reached, and Cassandra withdrew her lawsuit.

Despite reaching a financial settlement before going through the court system, P Diddy’s reputation had already been damaged. His public image has suffered dramatically.

Reflecting on R Kelly’s case and considering how many women have come forward accusing him of rape—including his former partner—it is likely that if he had substantial funds at his disposal, he would have sought an out-of-court settlement. While I do not support or dismiss any wrongful actions against women in any way whatsoever—I have observed numerous accusations made against various celebrities driven by financial motivations.

In the music industry, men often behave immaturely, while women may participate in more frivolous activities. It would be hard for any entertainer to claim they have never done something they are not proud of at some point in their career. Many musicians lead chaotic lives filled with womanizing tendencies alongside drug and alcohol abuse—all without much concern for their future consequences. They often father children across different cities during their tours.
I recall one instance where a famous Nigerian musician served as President of the Performing Musicians Association of Nigeria. One day, one of his children approached him, and he claimed not to know who the child was. Truthfully, he didn’t recognize his offspring. This musician was so famous and adored that every woman in South Western Nigeria would do anything to bear his child.

We can also recall former President Donald Trump once stating that when someone is a celebrity, they allow you to do whatever you want with them—and he wasn’t wrong. However, it should be noted that some of these individuals who consented initially may eventually pursue financial compensation from the celebrities involved. This phenomenon affects both male and female stars.

As the saying goes, “Money answers everything.” Many individuals who have accused various celebrities of wrongdoing often receive significant monetary settlements.

While the world and music industry rightfully condemn R Kelly for his irresponsible actions toward his accusers, we should also consider that if he had sufficient financial resources, he might have found a way out of the mess he created. There are countless other celebrities out there who may have committed worse deeds than R Kelly but continue to thrive due to their wealth.

As attention turns towards Jamie Foxx and the individual suing him for financial damages, I hope we allow the court system to decide this case fairly. The mainstream media tends to fixate on black celebrities—rarely waiting for legal resolutions before passing judgment on them; this severely damages their public image long before any jury reaches a verdict in their trials.

My prayer is that one day, R Kelly will be granted parole as nobody is above sin; none of us are saints.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Aguike

Continue Reading

Trending

Discover more from New York GM is your main source for news, music, fashion, travels & more

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading